Comparing Archtypical Fathers in Henry IV and The Chrysalids :: comparison compare contrast essays

Archtypical Fathers in total heat IV and The Chrysalids An ideal father is one who is both caring and understanding. To lodge this mould, one must express these characteristics. The outlook and actions of King heat content IV (Shakespeare, Henry IV Part 1) and Joseph Strorm (Wyndham, The Chrysalids), suggest characters who do not sum the mould of the archetypical ideal father. King Henry IV was a father who thought not much of his son. He sees his son as a riotous, irresponsible young man. King Henry tells Westmoreland that he is greedy of Lord Northumberlands son, Hotspur, and that he wishes he could be more honorable. It shows King Henrys wish of trust and grasp of his son through conversations with others. The King has a serious discussion with Prince Hal in act three, where he tells him that he is starting to arrange in the same trend as King Richard, and since he is playing this way, the people will not want him to be the King. The King has his receive i deas on how he thinks that the Prince should live, and for that reason has made the relationship between them genuinely difficult. If sole(prenominal) the King would have been more accepting, the Prince could have lived more exchangeable himself. Joseph Strorm is a father with very strict rules. He cares more closely the physical make up of a person than he does near the actual personality of the person. In the story a very frozen side of Joseph Strorm is shown he never gets close to his son at all. The only conversation shared between Joseph and his children are harsh and is often punishment. The way Joseph responded when David jokingly wished for a third arm showed that he cared more more or less his image and purity than he did for his own child. Both King Henry and Joseph Strorm lacked the ability to look eye